Lawyers pierce SC opposite Nirbhaya box advocates

LoginRegister@indiatimesLoginRegister@indiatimesLawyers pierce SC opposite Nirbhaya box advocates NEW DELHI: In an rare step, an organisation of women lawyers on Friday changed a petition in a Supreme Court not usually to retaliate dual masculine colleagues for their derogative views on women in a BBC documentary on Nirbhaya squad rape case, though also to quarrel a entrenched gender disposition among masculine advocates.

The Supreme Court Women Lawyers Association took displeasure during a comments of advocates M L Sharma and AP Singh in a documentary ‘India’s Daughter’ and sought a anathema on their entrance into a peak probity premises. The dual lawyers represented a indicted in a Nirbhaya case.

The petition, filed by disciple Mahalakshmi Pavani, said, “The comments done in a documentary (by a dual advocates) are inhumane, scandalous, unjustifiable, biased, vast and ill-minded and are a approach aspersion to and in defilement of grace of women, generally a women practising in a Supreme Court. These comments have caused a clarity of insecurity, indignation and fear among a womanlike lawyers practising in a Supreme Court.”

A twin of a dual advocates’ comments, that led to snub in polite multitude and indignant remarks on amicable networking sites, was submitted along with a petition.

Referring to Sharma’s comment—”a lady means… we immediately put sex in his eyes”, a petition said, “These difference entrance from a supposed saviour of probity unveils his genuine face and thoughts he binds for daughters, women and each citizen of a country.”

“The derogative and scornful difference used by Sharma make it transparent that according to him women shouldn’t be authorised to go out after a time specified by him; they should have no choice of selecting persons with whom they wish to spend time; they shouldn’t be authorised to cater men; they should not be authorised to live their life as per their wish; that women shall perpetually be calm from even meditative of being eccentric and say individuality,” a organisation said.

It also requested a probity to approach a passionate nuisance cabinet during SC to take movement opposite a duo. “The dual advocates be also destined to redress their statements and emanate a open reparation for holding and creation views that are positively derogative to a grace of women,” a petition said. Their reparation should also be enclosed in a BBC documentary, it said.

Stay updated on a go with Times of India News App. Click here to download it for your device.


  • Gun conflict nearby Yemen internat…
  • Obama, Biden accommodate with UK Roya…
  • Congress stalls Rajya Sabha on…
  • Trader forced to dedicate suicid…
  • Dalai Lama calls to honour al…
  • IAS officer DK Ravi’s death: K…
  • Landslide blocks highway in Ka…
  • DK Ravi’s death: Centre prepared …
  • Six people killed in lightning…
  • ISIS moving trusting minds …
  • Mamata has showed genuine ‘states…
  • IAS officer’s death: ‘Protesti…
  • 28 TB cases in one Kansas scho…
  • Woman stabs Longmont mom, cuts…
  • 2 passed in Sweden restaurant

Recent Messages ()


{{if user.username || user.id}}
{{if user.points}}


{{:user.pointsNeeded}} some-more points indispensable to strech subsequent level.
Know some-more about Times Points

{{if user.badge}}

{{for user.badge}}
{{if #index

{{:#parent.parent.parent.data.user.name}} {{:levelDesc}}

{{if user.badge.length 3}}

{{for user.badge}}




{{if parentusername}}

{{if user.location}}


{{if user.username || user.id}}



{{if id!=-1}}


<!–Characters Remaining: 3000–>


About The Author

Related posts

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.