120x600

Philips PerfectCare Expert GC9222 Review


What is a Philips PerfectCare Expert GC9222?

The Philips PerfectCare Expert GC9222 is a steam generator iron with some good facilities – elementary controls and a intelligent heat setting. But it also has flaws, many particularly a miss of reserve close and usually a medium volume of steam.

It’s not a bad product, yet for this cost we can do improved elsewhere – honestly we can buy a improved steam generator for a lot less.

Philips PerfectCare Expert GC9222 – Design and Features

This big, rather dark-looking steam generator offers a intelligent “OptimalTemp” environment for all fabrics and, unusually, is Woolmark approved.

Controls are unequivocally elementary indeed. The steam generator bottom has a singular symbol to spin it on and off (press and reason for 2 seconds to go into eco mode, that uses 40% reduction energy). And a iron itself usually has dual buttons – a finger trigger for continual steam and a ride symbol for a 340 g/min steam shot.

You can’t set a turn of steam or even a iron’s heat – instead a iron automatically selects it for you. The advantage of this is that we can iron panoply in any order, rather than carrying to lay them out in a right order, from delicates to linens.

On a side you’ll find a calc gourmet for easy cleaning – when a indicator tells we to, simply unscrew this (while a steam generator is cold) and rinse off a limescale deposits.

Storage is designed beautifully. There’s a space on any side, one for storing a steam hose and a other for storing a energy cable. The wire is lonesome in a same braided fabric as a hose, a good touch.

Sadly a same can’t be pronounced for a reserve lock. There isn’t one. That’s surprising for a steam generator and unequivocally annoying. If we have immature children, or even boisterous pets, it’s calming to be means to close a iron to a base, not slightest since it keeps a prohibited solitary image flattering many out of harm’s way.

But also many steam generators close a iron in a approach that lets we lift a whole apparatus by grabbing a iron handle. That’s only not probable with this Philips, that creates we unequivocally heedful of relocating it until it’s totally cooled down. There’s also no automobile off duty after a duration of inactivity.

Philips PerfectCare Expert GC9222 – What’s it like to use?

Simple things about a Philips’ pattern angry us from a start. For example, we have to detach a H2O tank to fill it, yet a tank can’t change by itself so if you’re stuffing it with a jug we have to reason a tank with one palm as we fill it.

Once filled, it comes to heat unequivocally quick – it was prepared in reduction than 2 mins on test.

The elementary controls are good in a way. The iron is unequivocally easy to use. But it’s a contrition that a Philips doesn’t let we set a heat – there’s only a intelligent “OptimalTemp” environment for all fabrics. This worked well, yet we’d cite to also have a choice of being in control.

Why? Because ironing isn’t always about panoply and fabric forms – if you’ve ever had to iron on name labels (some forms need a low temperature, others direct a highest) or used your iron to finish children’s Hama stone picture, you’ll know this.

Elsewhere though, a morality is excellent. For example, double-tap a steam trigger with your index finger for consistent steam, so we don’t have to keep squeezing.

The Philips glides over fabrics good yet there’s not a peppery volume of steam. And what steam it does furnish dies down after 30 seconds, unsatisfactory for a steam generator during this price. And a eco mode is weedier still – it gets a pursuit finished eventually, yet it’s not fast.

Should we buy a Philips PerfectCare Expert GC9222?

No. It has pattern flaws and it’s expensive. For not many some-more income we can buy a vastly higher Bosch Ultimate Steam Generator – a best behaving steam generator we’ve tested to date. Or save income and get a Polti Vaporella Forever 670 Eco or Tefal Effectis GV6760 instead.

Verdict

The Philips has some good features, yet pattern flaws and a sincerely costly cost tab meant you’d be improved off looking elsewhere.

About The Author

Related posts

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.